Nisargadatta in a nutshell:
You as a body/mind were born. You lived totally involved with the world and
your own instincts and desires, 100% involved, but not aware of yourself as an
identity, a human.
Then one day, out of nowhere,
sometimes between the age of 1-1/2 and 4, it dawned on you that you were alive
and existed. The I Am was born! You began then an existence of
self-awareness, self-consciousness, aware not only of your wants and needs, but
the realities imposed by the world.
Thus was born the beginnings of
getting your wants and needs fulfilled through various adaptive strategies,
including using your intelligence to create situations or items to fulfill your
needs. You flaunt your intelligence to
gain recognition or love. Later you may
flaunt your sexuality, maleness or femaleness to get what you want.
At school you learn reading,
writing, social skills, debating and how to be obedient and a good
consumer. You learn all kinds of things
that you integrate into your self-image, which is opposed to a non-self image
also developing, namely the external world. Now you have contracted from being
the world down to living in a mental creation.
Everything, all external data, all internal feelings and energies are
mediated by mind. You no longer live in
the real world but a mediated world.
All this is knowledge.
The first knowledge was “I Am.” Before that, though you existed, I, as an
entity was not born. Before that you
existed, functioning perfectly, instinctually, then the I am was born and
everything got fucked up.
After that you were just knowledge,
and in deep sleep, the knowledge was lost.
Peace. But still you existed,
just as you did before the I was born.
First you have unknowing, not
knowing. Then knowningness came and then
it went, back and forth. But you always
exist. You really are that principle
that knows. You are the one who contains
both knowing and not knowing.
This principle is the same in all
sentient beings. Everyone has the
knowing potential. There is only one kind of knowing principle and it is
embodied in all sentient beings. We all
share that as the base.
When your body mind dies, that
sentience dies in you and with it, your I Am. But the sentience, the
knowingness principle continues on throughout the universe.
But Maharaj says it is this I Am
that causes all the world’s problems and is your master. How to end it and find total freedom from the
needs and drives of the I Am?
He says to find the I Am in us,
abide in it, love it, and one day, but endless loving, it will go, it will
release you from its clutches once the original you, the principle behind
knowingness, recognizes you still exist even when the I Am has disappeared.
The I Amness has two qualities, love
and the generator of all activity. The I
Am rules all. It is the beginning and
end of everything that is visible and in experience, but YOU, as the ultimate
who holds even the I Am and God and the world in existence, are beyond all
that.
The trick I am adding to Nisargadtta’s
method, is to add the love you find for another, recognize that it is a love
for another that arises in you, focus on it, and become love itself. Once you
can identify with love itself, the Self, the universal holder of the I Am, the
pure I Am of all, will reveal itself to you as the most awe inspiring entity.
The grace of God will flow into you, and you will be completely happy, completely
ecstatic.
But you must understand, you, as you
take yourself to be, are only an idea.
You are a story, not an entity, not your body. You don’t exist as any entity. But what you
really are is the power of knowing or not knowing. Still you are not an entity; you are the
principle that sustains the universe, and that which understands these words.
Beautifully and lucidly put, Edji. I love the way you summarize and synthesize the inputs of Nisargadatta and Western psychology with your own experience and realizations. Very powerful stuff indeed. Thank you.
ReplyDeleteLove, Matthew
When I read I Am That, I am often amazed at Nisargadatta's deep psychological insights. I didn't see it at first, but after many readings and undergoing a bit of therapy myself, I realised that some of his teaching is not at all inconsistent with best practice Western psychology, always tailored to the specific questioner. Given that he had little or no formal education, THAT is pure knowledge speaking...
DeleteThis is really great.
ReplyDeleteThanks
Yes, thanks Edji. A very concise and clear exposition of the teachings. I'll be saving this and savouring it for many years I'm sure.
ReplyDeleteWelcome back Ed. After Rajiv, you went a wandering and I lost you. The masters have guided you home and you returned bearing gifts for us from your own heart. Mike L
ReplyDelete