Let’s get real about
Subtle Body energies, love and Self-Realization.
I use the term “Subtle
Body” as do Nisargadatta and Siddharameshwar to indicate that part of
Consciousness that lies between our experience of the physical body and the
phenomena revealed by the 6 senses including intuition, and the more subtle level
of Consciousness known as the Causal Body, where nothing is known; there is in
it a complete absence of knowing or even self-refection. One consciously
goes unconscious, and one is aware of nothing, including being aware. In its depths is complete forgetfulness.
I use this model not
because it is “truth,” for there is no truth in words or concepts, but as a
model, a hypothesis, used to contain and explain a wide range of spiritual experience.
For example, this model contains 1, the world we see, and our experience of our
body, the 2. Subtle Body phenomena of thought, emotions, energies, bliss, fantasy,
visions, etc., as well as 3. the realm of non-knowing, or forgetfulness, of
non-existence of the Causal body as experienced in deep sleep and various
meditations, and lastly, 4. the Fourth state, AKA the stateless state, Turiya,
Self, or the lovebliss body, as love and bliss are the key characteristic of
this state.
The essence of Turiya is
also defined by Advaita as Satchitananda, or existence, knowledge and bliss.
Knowledge here does not mean concepts, but awareness of objects and of
awareness, or self-awareness.
Such models are often
needed at the beginning of se;f-study because a lot of people require such
structure in order to let the mind rest and just practice a spiritual method,
such as self-inquiry or self-abiding. You need to remember this, for some
day you may be a teacher yourself, and you will need to be able to answer
students’ questions either from a model or without it. This is a good model if
they need one.
Even beyond Consciousness,
this model talks about Parabrahman, which is the witness of Consciousness,
lying beyond Consciousness, not part of it. This Parabrahman, is not
touched by Consciousness, is not born into Consciousness, and is only aware of
itself when it witnesses Consciousness as passing states, including Turiya, and
realizes even That is not part of It as the Witness, Parabrahman.
Parabrahman stands apart
from Consciousness, and witnesses its play. You would say that the
witness is not part of existence, for it is never known as an object, but only
as “me,” the subject or an absolute self witnessing Consciousness from a
“distance.” That is, I become aware of myself as witness only when I no longer
identify with Consciousness, either as “beingness,” or “here and now,” or of
the totality of Consciousness as a oneness state where I become an impersonal One,
and I Am even separate from lovebliss.
Now Siddharameshwar and
Nisargadatta as well as Ramana, provide a method for exploring the various
“levels” of Consciousness, which is the use of a mantra, such as “Who am I?” or
better, locating the “I Am” sense, and following it, abiding in it, and
hopefully playing with that sensation by loving it, welcoming it, wondering how
it would feel if it flowered.
According to the model,
following the mantra or I am sense “deeper” and deeper and deeper leads to an
experience of Self, of Turiya, (the blissbody), the root level of Consciousness
which is experienced as light, love and bliss/ecstasy/power.
From there one realizes
that despite identifications with various levels of Consciousness, as
Parabrahman, you are the “deepest” level, apart even from Consciousness and
even love/bliss.
However, at this point
Siddharameshwar warns the practitioner to continue to be devoted to the Self as
found as Turiya, as well as all the rest of manifestation of Self and the
individual found in Consciousness, presumably to prevent becoming dead to one’s
own Self and the world. If one habitually identifies with that
which witnesses Consciousness, the meditator will die to the world and
Consciousness, as Nisargadatta said was happening to him at the end of his
life.
Both he and Robert Adams,
my teachers, were dead to the world. They
were “finished” with it; they had tasted all it had to offer and found the
world wanting in terms of drawing their attention.
You need to understand
that these 4 levels of Consciousness and the Absolute coexist, and once you are
aware of each, they are all always equally accessible. That is, the Causal
body of forgetfulness, nothingness is always there, always existing even when
in the ordinary waking state, the dream state, the sleep state, and in
Turiya. One can always be aware of it existing in and around your
Consciousness once you have tasted each level it in its separate purity.
All four levels of
Consciousness and the Absolute Witness all simultaneously exist. One just has to tease each out of the
totality matrix. The Subtle Body phenomena, the Causal Body, Turiya are all
simultaneously available to itself and to the Absolute.
Now, as to the Subtle
Body, one might say it is both the container of subjective phenomena, or inner
special awareness, and all of the subjective experiences available to a human
that include thought, imaging, images, memories, emotions, the I Am sensation, chakras,
and also inner sounds, like tinnitus and other spiritual sounds, visions,
astral projections, love, bliss and inner energies, whether of the
Kundalini-described sort, the generic term Shakti, Chi, meridian energies, and orgasms.
Included are the various visions of lights, whether of oneself, or the Self, as
a blinding white light, or enormous spectrums of colored lights found
associated with various inner flows of emotions or energies, love, devotion,
etc. , or seen externally as auras, or energy fields of a flowing
and not solid world.
Now, the love, bliss,
ecstasies, and much of the light phenomena are really “leakages” of the Turiya
root source Consciousness into the Subtle Body area of Consciousness, felt at
the Subtle body level as either I Am, or as a withdrawn and distant Witness according
to the Siddharameshwar model. That is, practice of the mantra of abiding
in the I Am, leads one’s awareness to ever more subtle and more invisible
states including the blissful “knowing nothing” of the Causal Body, and experiencing
total ecstatic bliss and light of Turiya.
Of course there are many
other models of the entire awakening process, some of which totally ignore the
Causal Body, ignore the experience of no-experience, or the experience of vast
emptiness and the Voids. Other models totally ignore the ecstasy bliss
states and go only for emptiness, beingness, Void or the Absolute.
In fact, even within the
Subtle body you have a choice of what to look for: The sense of I Am, which
will take you to Turiya, the love/bliss area, or to attend to the “looker,” the
“searcher,” which leads to the Absolute beyond Consciousness.
I chose the Siddharameswar
model as it can be used to explain almost any type of spiritual experience and
awakening, does not use terms like God, goddess, the feminine or masculine,
Shiva or Shakti, Mother, etc., which is a model valuable for worshiping
abstract elements like Kali or Shakti, love and devotion, but also adds a whole
pantheon of Hindu beliefs and concepts that can bind you.
The Siddharameshwar model
seems more clean, yet preserves love and devotion, and is broader in explaining
a wider range of experiences. Also, eventually all models are shunned and
the student learns to address experiences as they arise without interpretation,
assigning meaning, or judging it as a lesson to be learned.
Also, the standard
progression as assigned by Siddharameshwar is a progressive “deepening” or
better, becoming more subtle in one’s discriminating awareness, able to grasp
ever more refined emotional and energetic experiences, meaning ideally, the
student becomes a Bhakta when exploring the Turiya level of Consciousness, then
a Jnani when he/she realizes and identifies as the witness separate from
Consciousness. Of course the opposite is true if instead of concentrating
on I Am, one concentrates on finding the looker, the subject, the witness.
I chose the latter approach
from the beginning of my practice over 40 years ago and entirely missed Turiya,
the existence/knowledge/bliss body, but found it in explosive upheaval when I
fell in love. It was as if my internal
emptiness exploded in love. The love exploded
into the Voids and filled them with a nectar of sweet and ecstatic love.
Because my own experience
of realizing Self was as a result of a personal love that grew and grew until
it became explosively “divine,” and felt like the arising of God in me, from my
“innards,” attended by huge and explosive energies, a total white-light
absorption of all visual phenomena, an explosive ecstasy that wiped away mind
and small self, along with feeling enormous gratitude, a total surrender to God
and grace. When the experiences cleared a few hours later, I was aware of
myself as Self, and also as Ed Muzika, a mind/body/energetic field entity
intimately tied to my divine Self as a union. This experience
was repeated many times leaving a residual bonding between God and I, my Self
and self.
From this position I now
see that the driving force was not lovebliss, not Shakti, but love, devotion
and surrender to the other, whether lover or God, or cat or idol, or mother.
The driving force is not the energies, but sheer love, devotion, surrender,
becoming nothing oneself, and the other becomes everything. In losing
myself in the Other, whether the divine Self within, or another human, I am
powering my own transformation through surrender to ever more subtle
nothingness. I am nothing, only the other and God is great.
Transformation does not
come from the energies, from Shakti, from Chi, these are all set alight by love.
In fact, concentration on
just the Subtle body energies is a distraction. Though the body and mind
can get increasingly electrified and occupied with these internal energies, it
is the love that transforms. The blisses and ecstasies are not the goal,
but are the icing on the cake so to speak, or as David Spiro says, are the
body’s reward for practice.
Those who concentrate
solely on energies, bliss, ecstasies, can become trapped in the Subtle body
according to the Siddharameshwar model.
Also, it is a mistake to
say the principle of identification disappears upon awakening or enlightenment,
after which one no longer identifies with the body/mind. The
identification with body/mind must disappear way before Self-Realization, it is
a pre-condition.
What happens in
Self-Realization is that identification is freed so that it is free flowing,
sometimes identified with love/bliss, sometimes identified with the body/mind,
sometimes identified with a vision, sometimes identified with inner lights,
sometimes identified with the Other, whether self, or a cat, or a lover,
sometimes identified with one’s own energy body which I call my (little) self
or presence, sometimes identified with the energies or Shakti, sometimes
identified with the Voids.
Then sometimes one
identifies with the divine body one feels,the Self, and which permeates
everything.
That is, I can identify
with whatever I want, or I can let the identification process choose itself by
free-flowing to be what I am at any moment. Sometimes I am Self,
sometimes God, sometimes Ed Muzika, with emotional experiences ranging from
great love to rage and jealousy, sometimes with other powerful emotions, sometimes
with a summer sunset, sometimes with ecstasy, sometimes nothingness, and often
with another, whether lover, a student, a teacher, a stranger. I am open
and flowing everywhere and also nowhere in particular. This is true freedom:
witnessing oneself and the world as free flowing, not fixed, objectless except
the object may be permeated by the divine essence. It all mixes together in a flowing whole.
love this post..
ReplyDeleteSharada
Edji - this post is abundnant with gems.. with every read there is something more to be found - "The identification with body/mind must disappear way before Self-Realization, it is a pre-condition."
ReplyDeleteHi, I havn't read you prior to this Edji, so I looked around a bit and found this particular blog post of yours.
ReplyDeleteI've been looking at the love angle myself. As it forms the inspiring-ness. I mean 'how to be inspired by another'...which also led me down a similar journey as your own (I suppose...just by reading a few posts of yours...).
It really is an Eastern tradition (ie. loving the one who gives, ie. ideally teaches), I feel and so the reason, (I suppose again), I was attracted to a teacher (Paul Lowe, who later inspired me as well...to awaken from identification with form), who developed this gift (is it?) in India (spent 8 years with osho).
We havn't develop such a pathway here in the Western traditions.
In addition, I've read a few post of yours on the neo-advaita students posing as teachers. I do have to say I've had a similar feeling, though I don't have your background, to expose it as fully.
I went a different route to figure out why all the mixed up messages (their facebook posts move through out every forum...and so unable to avoid them) where around. I lay the blame of Papaji, who made some of them teachers (supposedly, no proof) to get them out of his care, not because they were capable.
All I got on the love topic.