I AM RETHINKING HOW AND WHAT TO TEACH
I have to rethink my teaching methods and style. I often
forget that my spiritual life began at age 11, some 63 years ago. I was
initiated into Kriya Yoga via the Self-Realization Fellowship at 14, and spent
a number of years as an academic trying to figure out what to do with my life.
My formal, institutional meditation life began in 1968
studying with Phillip Kapleau in Rochester New York for two years, quickly
followed by a winter at Mt. Baldy Zen Center.
I then moved to the International Buddhist Meditation Center where I
studied with five different Zen masters: Thich Tien-An; Maezumi Roshi; Kozan
Roshi; Seung Sahn Soen Sa; and Song Ryong Hearn.
After that I was with Muktananda and his monks, including my
friend Shankarananda, Dhyanyogi, and finally Robert Adams and Jean Dunne.
I have had tens of thousands of meditation experiences, been
in close associations with dozens of masters over six decades, and had many
massive and small awakenings over those years.
But I realize now, as a teacher, I have had a wrong
attitude. I have always tried to convey
final teachings without taking students through the baby steps necessary to
realize the deeper truths.
For example, even before I went to the Rochester Zen Cener,
I had already opened my “Third Eye” to the inner light of consciousness, which
revealed an inner world of emptiness.
This took less than a year to accomplish, by looking within my head to
find an inner light, then gradually expand it downwards into my body and
upwards into the space above.
Then I spent a year or two, either before or after this
emptiness phase (So long ago I don’t remember which came first.), struggling
with the rising of Kundalini energy in my spine, that felt like a six inch long
pointed pencil arising through my spine.
It kept getting stuck at the heart chakra level, and gradually, and very
painfully penetrated that level, rising to the top of my skull, drilling a hole
there, then descending again into my face, throat, and disappearing into my
heart and gut. With this phase were all sorts of energy phenomena described in
my book, Self Realization and Other Awakenings.
Then, when I went to Mt. Baldy already aware of my inner
emptiness, it was very easy to enter states of no minded oneness with the
world, where I and the world were one, with no separation. Later, I was to
realize this joyous, vivid reality I entered each meditation session, was
called the Manifest Oneness of Nisargadatta, the Atman, the Manifest Self.
Later, with Robert, I entered that non-dual consciousness
totally, in everyday life, with no centered self experience, and even saw the
unreality of consciousness itself. And a
few weeks later, recognizing that ‘I’ was separate from all of consciousness,
the manifest world and my body, all parts of consciousness.
Ten years later, after falling deeply in love with a woman,
out of that inner emptiness arose a different sense of self altogether, and
that was of an inner self of light, energy, love, devotion, and surrender, altogether
as an experience of the life force within me manifesting through me. Shakti, God, the divine, as bliss, light, and
energy in me. This was a new and
different manifestation of the Manifest Self, at once totally divine and
removed, but at the same time, the most powerfully personal manifestation of
the sense of I Am. I felt the reality of
Muktananda’s book, “I Have Come Alive!” as a personal confession. After that the energies and bliss manifested
through me until they left, leaving me in increasing peace, and deeper
experiences of consciousness disappearing into consciousness.
The trouble is, how does anyone convey the totality of 60
years of spirituality?
Everyone is in a different place when they come to me. Trying to convey everything at once is just
overwhelming, confusing, and maybe a bit frightening. I tend to mix it all together, various
disparate experiences combined with differing levels of teachings.
How to convey all of this? I didn’t
know. I tried always to teach from what
spontaneously arose within me to whomever was in front of me. But this is a mistake. Using this method, if I spoke to 100 people,
perhaps I was reaching only one or three people. The others had no idea of what I was talking
about because maybe they didn’t know the inner light or the utter reality of
emptiness, or perhaps they did not know self-inquiry, the life force, bliss,
etc.
However, a few caught on immediately, like Rajiv Kapur and a
few others. But most just looked,
listened, and then moved on overwhelmed by all the information and experiences
thrown at them.
Satsangs that I have led were the same. I spoke to many but only a few stayed. I think people were utterly confused or
overwhelmed by the sheer complexity of my teachings. The only thing that kept
many around was the energetic phenomena that arose in many who attended
Satsang. This is what attracts many people to teachers, but this is not the
teaching or the end of teaching.
I think I have to teach in stages and not necessarily the stages I passed
through. It depends on what the student
wants. Do they want to know themselves?
Do they want bliss? Do they want to know
the inner light and emptiness? Do they
want to know directly the life force within, inner energies, and bliss? Do they want to learn how to heal using inner
energies? Or do they want
self-realization without knowing what that means, and be willing tp listen,
learn, and practice based just on trust and faith?
All of this knowledge fits together for me, but certainly
will not for a beginner or someone curious about inner work and its potential. So
how do I break up my teachings into steps, each with an outcome? Some steps require previous steps or outcomes
and some don’t.
In this approach, much more is required of the student. They must know what they want and be prepared
to persist in their efforts to explore different aspects of their inner life, an
endeavor that ultimately has no worldly usefulness, but only, ultimately to
deliver self-realization at all levels and peace, complete relaxation.
And, I have to relax and not try to convey the entirety of
60 years experience all at once. I need to give small bites at a time. Make sense?
But how to do this?
After 60 years I know that the Advaita teachings of Robert
Adams, Nisargadatta, and Ramana are the core teachings that should never be
ignored, and self-inquiry in its various forms from psychotherapy, so sitting in
silence, to diving deep within to understand all level of consciousness and
beyond, are all part of an open and wide path that will ultimately lead to
self-realization. But I know only a few,
a small percentage of all seekers, are interested in this topic or are destined
to finish their course within its arms.